Voted yes. A few things we like are the service provider relationship and the investment in the team and security.
The service provider status is a strong step towards decentralizing the development of the protocol by leaving room for other organizations to complement or step in for Hop Labs should they ever need additional help or be unable to continue this work entirely.
With respect to investment in human capital, we broadly support increased investment. The success of Hop hinges on both its UX and its security. Hop’s UI is among, if not the, strongest in the space. We anticipate this only improving with time and see investment as the core means of achieving this. Furthermore, bridges are a notorious security challenge. Excluding other programs like bug bounties or additional one-off audits, $144K might even be lower than we would like to see, particularly as this expense is likely to be front heavy as @cwhinfrey mentioned.
An area for improvement could be issuing this security budget as a lump sum annually rather than monthly as these costs seem unlikely to be so cleanly divisible.