@david-mihal while liquidity isnāt a core component of the protocol, I agree with @RichardShart in that bridge liquidity providers likely donāt want to see their HOP rewards diminishing in value over time. This may create a vicious circle with LPs eventually choosing to go elsewhere.
Bond Protocol seems to have a number of long term positives for both the DAO treasury and HOP buyers, but the UX may not be too familiar to folks. How could we best inform the governance community of it?
Perhaps exploring both a single-side Uniswap pool and a bond market is a possible approach?