hey guys I donāt understand what you expect me to do here. I read the OP post but I donāt get what exactly I need to do.
I voted for all votes since the start of governance except for Snapshot which was due to travelling and not having access to the key.
My addresss is 0x2b888954421b424c5d3d9ce9bb67c9bd47537d12 and I always expain the vote in the corresponding topic post (even the one I missed and why) and also in a tweet.
Name: 
Address: .eth (or fourpoops.eth) - 0xDE3ba1B41e6c612a3Ca3213B84bdaf598dfFdb9b
Total comp (both periods): 6529.84650745
Period participation (Snapshot): 2/2 - (HIP-23, HIP-24) - 100%
Period communication: 2/2 - (HIP-23 , HIP-24) - 100%
Cumulative participation: 2/2 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 2/2 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 302331.57555577817
Formula incentives: 3256.69227565
Period participation (Snapshot): 7/7 - (HIP-25, HIP-26, HIP-27, Ambassador Votes[3], Hop Liquidity Temp Check) - 100%
Period communication: 7/7 - (HIP-25, HIP-26, HIP-27, Ambassador Votes[3], Hop Liquidity Temp Check) - 100%
Cumulative participation: 9/9 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 9/9 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 305623.62555577816
Formula incentives: 3273.1542318
Bob-Rossi
Mar 11 - Apr 10
| Proposals ending within the period | Onchain (Tally) / Offchain (Snapshot) | Participation | Communication |
|---|---|---|---|
| [HIP-23] - Proposal to deploy HOP on Scroll zkEVM | Snapshot | Voted āForā | [Request for Comment] - Proposal to deploy HOP on Scroll zkEVM |
| [HIP-24] Voting System Choice for Hop DAO Elections | Snapshot | Voted āWeightedā | RFC: Voting System Choice for Hop DAO Elections - #25 |
period Participation: 2/2
period Communication: 2/2
newPeriod Count = 1
newPeriod Participation = 2/2 = 100%
cumulative Communication = 2/2 = 100%
lowest for the period: 79,581
formula incentives: 0
Apr 11 - May 10
| Proposals ending within the period | Onchain (Tally) / Offchain (Snapshot) | Participation | Communication |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIP 25 Lito Departure | Snapshot | Voted āForā | [RFC] Lito Departure - #4 |
| Temperature Check - How To Increase Liquidity for the HOP Token? | Snapshot | Voted āNo Changeā | Temperature Check - How to Increase Liquidity for the HOP Token? - #12 |
| [HIP-27] Launch Hop on Polygon zkEVM Mainnet | Snapshot | Voted āForā | [Request for Comment] Launch Hop on Polygon zkEVM Mainnet - #6 |
| HOP-Rocket Pool Ambassador Vote | Snapshot | Voted āDybsyā | I did not comment as I assumed it was unnecessary for a simple election choice, if I need to in the future please let me know |
| [HIP-26] Fast Bridging Support for rETH | Snapshot | Voted āForā | [RFC] Fast Bridging Support for rETH - #15 |
| HOP-Optimism Ambassador Vote | Snapshot | Voted 50/50 Between Max-Andrew & Francom | I did not comment per above |
| HOP-Arbitrum Ambassador Nominees | Snapshot | Voted 33/33/33 Between Max-Andrew & Francom & Frisson | I did not comment per above |
period participation 7/7:
period communication 7/7:
newPeriod Count = 2
newPeriod Participation = 9/9 = 100%
cumulative Communication = 9/9 = 100%
lowest for the period: I could not get Dune Query to runā¦ I will update after I figured out why
formula incentives: 0
TOTAL COMP for newPeriods 1 and 2: 0
bobrossi.eth - 0xb29A655f3D67B2B6724Fb22B2C2303cB660c946B
olimpio.eth
100% period participation: 2/2 - (HIP-23, HIP-24)
100% period communication: 2/2 - (HIP-23, HIP-24)
Cumulative participation: 2/2
Cumulative communication: 2/2
Lowest for the period: 652668.9270090404
Formula incentives period 1: 4426.42527884
100% Period participation: 7/7 - (HIP-25, Temp Check Liquidity, HIP-27, HIP-26, ARB ambassador, OP ambassador, rETH ambassador)
100% Period communication: 7/7 - (HIP-25, Temp Check Liquidity, HIP-27, HIP-26, ARB ambassador, OP ambassador, rETH ambassador)
Cumulative participation: 9/9
Cumulative communication: 9/9
Lowest for the period: 644901.4319771744
Formula incentives period 2: 4408.22669445
Total period 1 + total period 2 = 4426.42527884 + 4408.22669445 = 8834.65197329
0xF4B0556B9B6F53E00A1FDD2b0478Ce841991D8fA - olimpio.eth
Edit: using P=0 out of caution, will update if necessary
Hi mate, you need to draft a brief report like the ones other delegates have posted. The report muse include your participation rate (votes) and your communication rates (explanations of the votes) with individual links to the votes and to the posts communicating.
After that, use the new formula in the first post
I = ((log(h) - 4.55) * 3500) * M
M = 1 + (0.1 * P)
=>
I = ((log(h) - 4.55) * 3500) * 1 + (0.1 * P)
To calculate your HOP āformula incentivesā, and include that number in your report.
āhā for your specific wallet address can be found here, change the dates to reflect the periods.
Name: Lefteris Karapetsas
Address: 0x2B888954421b424C5D3D9Ce9bB67c9bD47537d12
Compensation payout address: 0x9531C059098e3d194fF87FebB587aB07B30B1306
Total comp (both periods): 14016.2065373
The compensation payout address, like in the last period belongs to rotki as I would like all compensation go directly there.
Period participation (Snapshot): 2/2 - (HIP-23, HIP-24) - 100%
Period communication: 2/2 - (HIP-23 , HIP-24) - 100%
Cumulative participation: 2/2 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 2/2 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 3519310.404120717
Formula incentives: 6987.60150695
Here I missed to vote on HIP-27 but wrote in discord that I could not make it due to travelling and having no access to my voting key as the voting period is only 5 days and I landed back hours after vote closed.
Period participation (Snapshot): 6/7 - (HIP-25, HIP-26, Ambassador Votes[3], Hop Liquidity Temp Check) - 85.71%
Period communication: 7/7 - (HIP-25, HIP-26, HIP-27, Ambassador Votes[3], Hop Liquidity Temp Check - 100%
Cumulative participation: 8/9 (88.88%)
Cumulative communication: 9/9 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 3615537.462238708
Formula incentives: 7028.60503036
Hey thanks a lot. I did that according to your suggestions. But oh boy thatās quite manual for something that can be checked easily by following the forum and/or snapshot. Plus without having this automated we run the risk of someone cheating.
Someone from hop should run these numbers, double check everything and then tell each delegate what their payout is according to the rules. Otherwise we can end up with someone cheating, or even making a mistake without their knowledge.
And since the process is so manual and error-prone, and takes time out of each delegateās day if someone from Hop does end up running the numbers we should not be doing that ourselves manually.
I agree, generally, that this information shouldnāt be manually and individually collated, because thereās so much information to parse and itās too to game. I know Shane goes through these threads each period to confirm various parameters but donāt know how far that goes. Ultimately, automation of such a process should be the goalāI just donāt know what that looks like.
Some thoughts on automation:
I believe things could be automated, but not on its current form. For a bot to check communication automatically (minimum delegated amount and participation are easier) then it would probably be better that delegates estandarize communications in some way.
Right now some people post to Twitter, others comment in the specific forum post, and others have a dedicated forum thread with comments on their decisions. Some of those comments are standalone (for example one comment per HIP) and some others bundle communications from multiple HIPs in the same comment.
For a bot to consider all of this and not fail there would probably be some kind of technical development need, or a single place where delegates post their feedback that something automated can easily tap into (Google sheets?)
BTW, I also think it would be a great idea to automate or even partially automate some of this process. Participation and minimum HOP delegated per user should not be that difficult.
Does it make sense to add our comments to the vote itself. See example from zenodotus.eth with [Temperature Check] HOP Airdrop Sybil Hunter Distribution
It would make it simpler to then scrape from a single source:
https://snapshot.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/bafkreihqztff3n5jjfeh45yicy5frmqgnxwqntsep7oys4vyj7e3d7cuhy
Our intentions are then more easily viewable and readily available to other voters at vote time. Could possibly automate cross posting to the forum too. Though that might be a bit more tricky.
Name: Max Andrew
Address: 0x31e69c05EE240A30CC2A007FEa3d0835f0a14096
Total comp (both periods): 3090.61530558
Period participation (Snapshot): 2/2 - (HIP-23, HIP-24) - 100%
Period communication: 2/2 - (HIP-23 , HIP-24) - 100%
Cumulative participation: 2/2 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 2/2 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 98065.55086088562
Formula incentives: 1545.30765279
Period participation (Snapshot): 7/7 - (HIP-25, HIP-26, HIP-27, Ambassador Votes[3], Hop Liquidity Temp Check) - 100%
Period communication: 7/7 - HIP-25, HIP-26, HIP-27, Ambassador Votes, Hop Liquidity Temp Check - 100%
Cumulative participation: 9/9 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 9/9 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 98065.55086088562
Formula incentives: 1545.30765279
Address: francom.eth - 0xA2b15ce187165bC1723Df411d9887d738FabE5f7
Total comp (both periods): 4,183.3729
2023-03-11 - 2023-04-10
Period participation (Snapshot): 2/2 - (HIP-23, HIP-24) - 100%
Period communication: 2/2 - francom march/april thread - 100%
Cumulative participation: 2/2 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 2/2 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 138354.86768237292
Formula incentives: 2068.48055172
2023-04-11 - 2023-05-10
Period participation (Snapshot): 7/7 - (HIP-25, HIP-26, HIP-27, Ambassador Votes[3], Hop Liquidity Temp Check) - 100%
Period communication: 7/7 - francom april/may thread - 100%
Cumulative participation: 9/9 (100%)
Cumulative communication: 9/9 (100%)
Lowest for the period: 142644.48372670714
Formula incentives: 2114.89243528
The Dune query has been updated to Duneās new v2 SQL engine (thanks for calling that out @francom).
The posts in this thread will be verified on Monday June 19 at 12:00:00 UTC so that they can be included in the next HOP incentive distribution. Complete your reporting on this thread by that time.
With regards to verification, in its current form it is quite trivial, assuming everyone provides all required information. I would be happy to discuss automating it the process in an open way, but wanted to add context by calling out that verification generally takes <30 minutes thanks to the detailed posts.
Hey @thegreg.eth I donāt see any communication (tweet, forum post, etc.) as a rationale for your votes. Do you have a link to that communication?
Hey @shanefontaine the table in my post above has a communication column which is somewhat cropped in the standard browser. Did you see those? Some of the rationales admittedly were fairly brief.
I would vote to remove the communication part. Itās making things really hard. For example look at the latest snapshot: Snapshot
It does not even have an accompanying forum post. Where should we post? And why even? To just say, I voted for since this is just rubber stamping?
Letās not create mindless beauraucracy and work for all delegates and the team.
So I am using this post to say I voted for that snapshot as per HIP-18 
Lol clearly youāre right itās just busywork in some scenarios. I think we can add more nuance to the requirement but I do think it adds value when people are incentivized to contribute to forum discussions though.
Hey Shane, can you check my address between April 11th and May 10th on the query? I canāt find myself, and I know I had delegated HOP at that period.
0xb29A655f3D67B2B6724Fb22B2C2303cB660c946B
I know Iām going to be under 90k anyway, so mostly to bring up as Iām not sure if there is a potential bug for anyone else.
I had a similar issue @Bob-Rossi. Extending the end date out past the problematic period seems to resolve it. Try to June 11. Of course if youāve reduced the holdings after May 10 then your min value will be lower and not so useful.
