Temperature Check - How should HOP compensate Multi-Sig Signers

[Sisyhpos]

Hi! Thanks for putting the snapshot together.
Though I am aligned with compensation, I voted No for the reasons I shared here (i.e. compensation tied to a proxy of the effort/cost, metrics of work being done, and a review of compensating learning curve), as well as in alignment with the reasons expressed by @fourpoops in this thread:

@fourpoops

I’m currently abstaining from this vote (and my change my vote to no) as I think it needs more discussion and should also be coupled with some things discussed in the original RFC like setting how multi-sig signers are nominated, replaced, voted-in, etc. Namely, I think setting up nominations and an election (maybe every 6 months, coinciding with payments) is critical if signers are being compensated. I do think signers should be compensated (specifically in HOP), even if just to align incentives between the DAO and the signers, but I still feel that this is a large expense all things considered.