Hello Max, thanks for all of your replies.
As it is, I donāt view this proposal as a threat to HOPās price short term, nor is that, either, something that drives me personally in this analysis.
I place a greater importance on long-term value, and engaging with key, relevant Hop Discord or Twitter users who were not able to submit their applications on time seems like a good step in that direction, especially if it was intended that the claim window might be opened again.
My comment is rooted in the fact that we did not at all quantify or expressly make clear the impact of what is being proposed here. Not in amount of users affected by this new claim window, nor by potential quantity of new HOP being distributed or entering circulation.
It is not the same to open a claim window for 2,000,000 people versus opening a claim window for 579 people. I just believe that itās important to lay out every bit of information available (or estimated), so that there is clarity for delegates at the time to place a vote.
This said, I believe the impact for Twitter/Discord re-claim would be negligible, since there are very few users (579 total).
I donāt have any information about Authereum users, I could not find how many users were eligible originally. What we know is that they were allocated 0.5% of supply, 5M $HOP.
Itās important to debate and lay out as much information as possible on any impacts of any proposals. Iām open to any additional information that might arise before the vote window closes. Assuming all this information is correct, I will be voting yes on this proposal in Snapshot for the reasons expressed above.