Confirming I also voted âyesâ for this proposal with franco in mind.
Voted âForâ this proposal. Reason: [RFC] Head of DAO Governance and Operations Role - #2 by takeabreath
Voting to allow Francom to continue his role as the head of DAO governance and operations. I agree there is value to this role based on work done so far, and I think Francom has done a great job in this role (and would vote for him even if they were not just the only person running!)
I just voted âRe-elect Francomâ on âHead of DAO Ops Term Renewal or Terminationâ. Appreciate your contributions thus far @francom and the value you it brings to the DAO.
The following reflects the views of L2BEATâs governance team, composed of @krst and @Sinkas, and itâs based on the combined research, fact-checking, and ideation of the two.
Weâre voting FOR re-electing Francom as the Head of DAO Ops.
During the first term, Francom did a great job executing the roleâs mandate as outlined in the original proposal. Although there wasnât any report to summarize the actions and the âoutcomesâ of the Head of DAO Ops, we believe we shouldnât let that lack of bureaucracy bottleneck the process. Weâve been actively engaged in the DAO and are already aware of Francomâs contributions to the role. Perhaps publishing a summary of the things facilitated could be helpful for the following term and maybe worth including in the reelection âterms.â
Weâd like to see more communication between the Head of DAO Ops and delegates during this next term and more facilitation of proactive actions wherever needed and wherever possible. One such example from last term was facilitating the discussion for creating a Hop Grants Program, which is now live.