The below response reflects the views of L2BEAT’s governance team, composed of @kaereste and @Sinkas, and it’s based on the combined research, fact-checking and ideation of the two.
Does this RFC seek to just change the documentation of the governance process for Hop (found here), with the redesign workflow from Syncvote? Or does it also imply the adoption of Syncvote’s interface as outlined in your first post?
If the former, what would the operational and financial overhead for the DAO be?